Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has clashed with his key independent challenger in a debate in his Kooyong electorate – as the government steps up its attack on the unaligned candidates putting up an unexpected fight in blue-ribbon Liberal seats.
Mr Frydenberg and Monique Ryan went head to head in front of undecided voters in the the heart of his Melbourne electorate on Thursday afternoon, in a confrontation that was sometimes personal.
It took just two questions on climate change policies and electric vehicles in the debate for each to question the other’s integrity.
Dr Ryan claimed Mr Frydenberg was not a “moderate liberal” because he had never crossed the floor on a matter of conscience in his 12 years in parliament.
“This is a man who votes with Barnaby Joyce, every time, against what is essentially our national interest,” she said.
Mr Frydenberg said he was “happy to take fair criticism about the Liberal Party’s positions on certain policies”. But he accused Dr Ryan of trying to hide that she was once a Labor Party member.
“What I’m worried about, and hopefully what my local community’s worried about, is if they don’t go for a so-called independent, the likelihood of a hung parliament becomes all that more real,” he said.
Dr Ryan said she had never concealed her previous ALP membership.
The debate finished with questions on the pros and cons of a parliament without a clear majority. A balanced, or hung, parliament is considered likely if some of the teal challengers are successful on May 21.
Dr Ryan said such a result would be better for Australia.
“The only bill that’s been taken to parliament for an independent commission against corruption was Helen Haines, an independent. And the person who led the movement to stop the religious discrimination bill was Rebekha Sharkie, an independent,” she said.
“If independents like me are in a position where there is a hung parliament after the election, and we do have even more of a position to influence the government. I think that will be a positive thing”
But Mr Frydenberg used the example of managing the pandemic to argue it was better for a government to be able to pass legislation without negotiating with cross-benchers.
“With JobKeeper we were able to move really swiftly because we knew we had the confidence of the lower house, and we couldn’t make a decision such as that if we had to negotiate with the cross bench to reach a decision on the type of program and the levels of the support and how it would be delivered,” he said.
“Similarly, if the Prime Minister of the day could not reach an agreement like AUKUS with the United Kingdom and the United States because he didn’t have the authority of a majority in the lower house, then that would be counterproductive to Australia’s national interest. And so on the big issues of economic security and national security, we need the stability of government.”
Earlier, Prime Minister Scott Morrison ramped up his rhetoric against the independent challengers, warning of chaos and instability if they won seats.
“A vote for independents is a vote for chaos, it’s a vote for instability,” he said while campaigning in Sydney on Thursday.
“[With] a cavalcade of independents, you are inviting chaos and weakness, a strong economy versus a weak economy.”
Mr Morrison has been accused of avoiding inner-city seats such as Kooyong – as well as neighbouring Goldstein and the Sydney seats of Wentworth and North Sydney – where sitting Liberal MPs face tough challenges, largely due to his unpopularity with voters.
He made his fifth visit of the campaign to the Labor-held seat of Parramatta on Thursday, but is yet to campaign in Wentworth or North Sydney ahead of the May 21 federal election. He last visited Kooyong in April, attending a Passover service at a synagogue with Mr Frydenberg.
“I’m particularly focused on the contest that is happening between your two alternatives for government,” he said on Thursday.
“Now I’ve made the point very clear about independents, that’s a vote for chaos.”
He said independent candidates elected to parliament would inhibit the strong leadership Australia required to face economic and security challenges.
Tasmanian independent Andrew Wilkie described that as a “shameful slur” and said it proved how threatened the Coalition was by the independent challengers in Liberal-held seats.
“The allegation by the Prime Minister … that independent parliamentarians and candidates are a threat to Australia’s security is a shameful slur on decent people exercising their democratic right to stand for election,” he said in a statement.
“It’s also symptomatic of a government becoming increasingly hysterical at the realisation it’s out of step with a great many Australians.”
Mr Wilkie pointed out some crossbenchers, such as himself, had served in the defence and intelligence services and it was “outrageous” for Mr Morrison to criticise them.
Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese has aid he will both the crossbench and a Liberal-Nationals opposition, even if Labor wins a majority on May 21.
Source: Read More